Focus on Congress Focus on IRS and Treasury The EOTJ Mailbag

EO Tax Journal 2013-64

1 – The EOTJ Mailbag

2 – Treasury Still Targeting Deductible Easements, Supporting Section 4940 Excise Tax Change

3 – More on Senator Whitehouse’s Subcommittee Hearing

A – Statement of Mythili Raman, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Division, Department of Justice

B – Statement of Gregory L. Colvin, Adler & Colvin, San Francisco

Current & Quotable Focus on IRS and Treasury The EOTJ Mailbag

EO Tax Journal 2013-63

1 – The EOTJ Mailbag

2 – Has IRS Information Letter 2013-0004 Made IRS’s Position on Retroactive Revocation Crystal Clear?

3 – IRS Says Website or E-mail Solicitations Should Comply with Same Rules that Apply to Other Solicitations (INFO 2013-0001)

4 – NTEE Codes Not Relevant to Any Determination re Exempt Status (INFO 2013-0005)

5 – Rules Regarding Single-Member Domestic LLCs Outlined (INFO 2013-0006)

6 – Qualified Conservation Easement Must Be Protected in Perpetuity (INFO 2013-0014)

7 – Coalition Seeks Repeal of Special Rules for Churches

Current News and Developments PLRs, TAMs, and Denial Letters The EOTJ Mailbag

EO Tax Journal 2013-16

1 – The EOTJ Mailbag

2 – EO Committee Meets Today in Orlando

3 – EO Tax Humor (Why Not a Twelfth Information Letter?)

4 – Could Florida Suit Raise Inurement Issue for IRS vis-a-vis Scientology?

5 – NCRP Releases Latest Issue of “Responsive Philanthropy”

6 – Corporation’s Non-Voting Shares to be Held by PF will be Permitted Holdings under Section 4943 (PLR 201303021)

Current News and Developments Focus on Courts Focus on IRS and Treasury The EOTJ Mailbag

EO Tax Journal 2013-11

1 – The EOTJ Mailbag (Burke v. Commissioner)

2 – 2012 QCDs Have Until January 31, 2013

3 – No Hiding for Political (c)(4)s
a – Shadow Money Group Slammed in Montana Court
b – Democracy 21/Campaign Legal Center Reports Group to IRS
c – Did Tax-Exempt Groups Mislead the IRS on Political Spending?

4 – On Remand, Tax Court Holds Historic Facade Easement Had No Value for Charitable Contribution Purposes (Scheidelman v. Commissioner)