Today members of the EO Committee of the ABA’s Tax Section meet in Denver. I’ll have a transcript of the six panels in the near future. For your weekend reading, I’m sending along the outline to be used by panelists at the session on “Tax Issues Affecting Disaster Relief,” as well as a Fact Sheet on ACOs just released by the IRS.
Current News and Developments
EO Tax Journal 2011-169
1 – The EOTJ Mailbag
2 – Day Trip to Washington
3 – Senate Finance Committee to Review Incentives for Charitable Giving
EO Tax Journal 2011-168
1 – The EOTJ Mailbag
2 – Latest EO Committee Meeting Preview
EO Tax Journal 2011-165
As part of the panel on Healthcare Reform under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, it appears Elizabeth Mills will be discussing joint ventures at the October 21 meeting of the EO Committee of the ABA’s Tax Section. As one can tell from her outline, reprinted below, this is an important area that has largely been ignored by the IRS in recent years. Thirteen years ago we got Rev. Rul. 98-15 and its two extreme examples — good Situation 1 and bad Situation 2. Then we had a couple of court cases and, as Mills notes, we had Rev. Rul. 2004-51, “the most recent Service pronouncement on joint ventures.” Since this is a no-rule area, there are no private letter rulings. It has been reported that the IRS has accepted some joint venture arrangements in the context of applications for exemption, but we’ve learned few details.
EO Tax Journal 2011-164
Yesterday I went to day one of the annual tax program of the American Health Lawyers Association. The tone of the conference seemed to me to be set by the first session, “Through the Looking Glass,” featuring Theresa Pattara, Tax Counsel to Senator Charles Grassley, and Ron Schultz, who spearheaded the revised Form 990 effort when he was with the IRS, but who now resides within the hallowed halls of PricewaterhouseCoopers. As backdrop, we really needed David Fish’s musical accompaniment, with him singing, a la Mary Hopkins: “Those were the days, my friend, we thought they’d never end, we’d sing and dance forever and a day.”
As it is, peace reigns in the valley, now that the big bad wolf, Chuck Grassley, has moved to the Senate Judiciary Committee, and his sidekick, Dean Zerbe, to private practice. While Theresa reminded us of those days of lightning bolts, now section 501(r) and the defanged Schedule H are looked upon mostly as profit opportunities for accountants and attorneys, certainly not the feared Armageddon. Ron Schultz reminded us that the worst that came out of those fearful days was the need for a hospital to do a community health needs assessment. Other than some misguided folks in Illinois, all is well in the hospital community, at least from a tax perspective, in year 2011.
Following Pattara and Schultz was Steve Clarke, who is now the IRS’s ultimate authority on all Form 990 matters. He brought with him two colleagues, Judy Kindell and Garrett Gluth. Judy said that for the IRS folks it’s Happy New Year. Again, we needed David Fish, this time to sing Auld Lang Syne to mark the end of the IRS’s fiscal year. Not surprisingly, the EO Division is starting its new year without a workplan, but Judy promises it “soon,” which probably means we can expect it in time for Valentine’s Day. Speaking of the EO Division, my latest roster is already out of date, as Melaney Partner has been selected as the new Customer Education & Outreach director, and Holly Paz will be going on maternity leave, with the aforementioned David Fish acting for her, and Mary Jo Salins acting for him. The good news coming out of the EO Division is that, of the 300,000 automatic revocations, only 4,000 have sought reinstatement to date, indicating that most revoked organizations are defunct, hopefully abating Bill Brockner’s fears that these mass revocations would be cataclysmic for his beloved garden clubs and similar organizations clueless as to their tax obligations.
EO Tax Journal 2011-162
1 – No Recession in EO Hiring?
2 – Ms. Totally Anonymous Joins Mr. Totally Anonymous
3 – Two Responses to “Bad Liberal (c)(3) Spotted”
4 – How Many Angels Can Dance on the Head of a Pin?
5 – Will a Cap on Contributions Destroy Charities?
6 – Tax Court Finds NEA Members Have a Legal Right to Receive NEA Publications, Resulting in Allocation of a Portion of Members’ Dues to Circulation Income
EO Tax Journal 2011-157
1 – The EOTJ Mailbag
2 – Oprah Nudged Out by Gates and Buffett
3 – More Practical Solutions for Private Foundations
4 – Whither the EO Division?
EO Tax Journal 2011-154
1 – EOTJ Mailbag
2 – Weekend Reading
3 – Latest Information on Automatic Revocations from Sandy Deja
4 – Urban Institute’s “Snapshot” of Revoked Organizations
5 – COF Continues to Seek Update of Rev. Proc. 92-94
6 – IRS Revoking Credit Unions by Mistake?
EO Tax Journal 2011-151
1 – EOTJ Mailbag
2 – The Book Nook
3 – ECFA Announcement
EO Tax Journal 2011-147
With Labor Day approaching, I’m clearing off my desk of old business today so I can start fresh next week. If I missed anything, including your missives, my apologies, but in the last few weeks I’ve survived an earthquake, a hurricane, a power outage, and having my garage struck by lightning, so those are my excuses and I’m sticking with them.
1 – The EOTJ Mailbag
2 – Ellen Aprill Explains All
3 – New GuideStar Publication
EO Tax Journal 2011-144
1 – More on Compensation
2 – Duke Basketball Follows Georgetown to China
3 – Healthcare Groups Suggest Detailed Schedule H Changes
4 – ALI-ABA Program on Tax-Exempt Organizations
5 – Calling Nan Downing — Have These Guys Been Audited?
EO Tax Journal 2011-142
1 – Response to Beth Kingsley Interview
2 – Article Fails to Note Rules re Separate Entity Status
3 – More on the Gift Tax and Section 501(c)(4)
4 – Is This Organization a Good (c)(3)?
EO Tax Journal 2011-141
1 – Reaction to Latest ACT Committee Report
2 – EO Committee to Meet in the Mile High City
EO Tax Journal 2011-133
1 – Educational Resources
2 – Mark Your Calendar
3 – Taxpayer Dollars at Work in New York
4 – Media Matters
a – Gray Asks IRS to Revoke Media Matters’ Exempt Status
b – What Members of the EO Tax Bar Have Had to Say about Media Matters
EO Tax Journal 2011-128
If you have not read the complaint filed against Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, reprinted below, please read first the following Mission Statement of a group I’m calling XYZ and decide whether XYZ is an organization that could qualify under section 501(c)(3). To me it is a close question whether an organization that investigates elected government officials can satisfy the requirement that it “does not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office.”
EO Tax Journal 2011-125
1 – The Lack of Guidance Conundrum
2 – ABA’s Annual Wish List
3 – Primer on Election Finance
EO Tax Journal 2011-121
It’s hot everywhere, it’s the middle of July, news is supposed to be slow, so what do I have instead but one story after another to report. Whatever happened to the lazy days of summer?
1 – Mystery Solved
2 – IRS Alerted to Current 501(c)(4) Problems in 2002
3 – Some Nervousness Among Conservative (c)(4) Political Groups
4 – Should Liberal Group Be Nervous?
5 – The Sad Saga of Hershey Continues
6 – Cockroaches Remain, Facade Easements in Jeopardy
EO Tax Journal 2011-119
1 – The Iron Man of EO
2 – Is This the Camel’s Nose in the Tent?
3 – Common Cause Seeks IRS Audit of American Legislative Exchange Council
4 – Legal/Tax Ethics Discussion
5 – In D.C., Facade Easements Are as Ubiquitous as Cockroaches
EO Tax Journal 2011-114
1 – Form 990 Developments
2 – Latest on Application of Gift Tax to Donors to 501(c)(4)s
3 – Are Booster Club Dues Deductible?
4 – Gunderson to Leave Council on Foundations on September 1
EO Tax Journal 2011-110
1 – Have a Happy Fourth of July
2 – Call for Con Law Help
3 – Nonprofit Corporate Restructuring
(continued from email update 2011-109)
EO Tax Journal 2011-109
This and That
In response to yesterday’s query, “What would she have gotten if she had succeeded?”, Penelope says 15 days. Penelope says she got 30 days because she botched the job.
Regarding Bill Brockner’s comments published yesterday, Odysseus takes issue with Bill’s implication that small organizations, which are “generally without the benefit of expensive CPA and/or Bar assistance,” will now be required to hire the same. Odysseus wonders if Bill knows how simple it is to complete an e-Postcard, since all that is required are eight simple entries.
EO Tax Journal 2011-107
1 – More On Kip Dellinger’s Observations
2 – Is the Form 990-N Part of a Federal Conspiracy against Nonprofits?
3 – Using Affiliated Entities for Advocacy and Politics
EO Tax Journal 2011-104
Today I’m sending along Bob Boisture’s article on the recent AARP hearing. His article was previously published by Tax Analysts, so you may have already seen it.
Bob is very concerned by what he views as the deeply flawed legal analysis presented in the report on AARP prepared by two House Republicans. He is also concerned that AARP has not presented a more rigorous and comprehensive statement of its legal position. In his opinion, AARP has by far the stronger side of the legal issues raised in the report, but he does not believe AARP’s various public statements have made this sufficiently clear, making it easier for House Republicans to justify continuing their investigation.
EO Tax Journal 2011-103
1 – More on ACT Committee
2 – Current Tax Issues for Colleges and Universities