1 – The EOTJ Mailbag (Kip Dellinger)
2 – Another EO Christmas Carol?
3 – Brief Summary of Session of the 15th Annual Western Conference on Tax-Exempt Organizations
4 – In Case You Missed It (IRS’s Latest EO Update)
Paul Streckfus, Editor
1 – The EOTJ Mailbag (Kip Dellinger)
2 – Another EO Christmas Carol?
3 – Brief Summary of Session of the 15th Annual Western Conference on Tax-Exempt Organizations
4 – In Case You Missed It (IRS’s Latest EO Update)
1 – Report to Readers (Part 2)
2 – The EO Grapevine (Form 990 Notification of Changes)
3 – The EOTJ Mailbag (Victoria Bjorklund on DAFs)
1 – The EOTJ Mailbag
2 – Universities Still Drawing Senator Grassley’s Ire
3 – Latest College and University Salary Report
4 – Where the Money Really Is
5 – Leaders of Islamic Charity Lose Appeal
6 – Deduction Lost, But Donor Acted in Good Faith
7 – ECFA Seeks Public Input on Church Tax Issues
1 – The EOTJ Mailbag
2 – Outline from Yesterday’s D.C. Bar Program on Use by EOs of ADR
3 – Revised Pub 557 Released
1 – The EOTJ Mailbag
2 – Noted in Passing
3 – Go West, Young Woman
4 – Program Dilemma and Interesting Query
5 – PRIs — Threat to Charity Sector?
1 – Who Says the IRS Doesn’t Answer its Mail?
2 – To Sign or Not to Sign
3 – Hearing Today on Challenge to California AG’s Rejection of Hospital Sale
4 – IRS Letter and Form 990 Survey to Selected Participants
1 – To Think It All Began in 1964
2 – New Information on University Audits
3 – Sandy Deja’s Latest Auto-Rev Figures
4 – ACGA Seeks Expanstion and Permanent Extension of IRA/Charitable Rollovers
1 – The EOTJ Mailbag
2 – IRS And Franchise Tax Board Asked To Investigate Way Out Ministries For Campaign Violations
3 – IRS Rationale in Revoking Organization Shows Some Confusion
It looks like Harvey Dale, Director, National Center on Philanthropy and the Law (NCPL), and I are at loggerheads. On Friday, November 4, 2011, I prepared today’s email update, which follows. Yesterday I received an email from Harvey voicing his displeasure with my prior reporting. I have reprinted, per his request, his email to me, which follows today’s report. I think we have both made our positions clear, and I’m open to readers’ input on the issues that have been raised.
1 – Old Business
2 – Networking Group Denied Exemption
3 – 43 AGs Seek Legislation Allowing States “To More Freely Obtain and Use” EO Information from the IRS
Yesterday I went to the annual conference of the National Center on Philanthropy and the Law at New York University School of Law. (The conference will conclude today.) The approximately 50 invited guests are a Who’s Who of EO practitioners and academics. The agenda for the conference was “Border Patrol: Charitable Status Despite Inurement or Private Benefit?”
Today members of the EO Committee of the ABA’s Tax Section meet in Denver. I’ll have a transcript of the six panels in the near future. For your weekend reading, I’m sending along the outline to be used by panelists at the session on “Tax Issues Affecting Disaster Relief,” as well as a Fact Sheet on ACOs just released by the IRS.
1 – The EOTJ Mailbag
2 – Day Trip to Washington
3 – Senate Finance Committee to Review Incentives for Charitable Giving
1 – The EOTJ Mailbag
2 – Latest EO Committee Meeting Preview
As part of the panel on Healthcare Reform under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, it appears Elizabeth Mills will be discussing joint ventures at the October 21 meeting of the EO Committee of the ABA’s Tax Section. As one can tell from her outline, reprinted below, this is an important area that has largely been ignored by the IRS in recent years. Thirteen years ago we got Rev. Rul. 98-15 and its two extreme examples — good Situation 1 and bad Situation 2. Then we had a couple of court cases and, as Mills notes, we had Rev. Rul. 2004-51, “the most recent Service pronouncement on joint ventures.” Since this is a no-rule area, there are no private letter rulings. It has been reported that the IRS has accepted some joint venture arrangements in the context of applications for exemption, but we’ve learned few details.
Yesterday I went to day one of the annual tax program of the American Health Lawyers Association. The tone of the conference seemed to me to be set by the first session, “Through the Looking Glass,” featuring Theresa Pattara, Tax Counsel to Senator Charles Grassley, and Ron Schultz, who spearheaded the revised Form 990 effort when he was with the IRS, but who now resides within the hallowed halls of PricewaterhouseCoopers. As backdrop, we really needed David Fish’s musical accompaniment, with him singing, a la Mary Hopkins: “Those were the days, my friend, we thought they’d never end, we’d sing and dance forever and a day.”
As it is, peace reigns in the valley, now that the big bad wolf, Chuck Grassley, has moved to the Senate Judiciary Committee, and his sidekick, Dean Zerbe, to private practice. While Theresa reminded us of those days of lightning bolts, now section 501(r) and the defanged Schedule H are looked upon mostly as profit opportunities for accountants and attorneys, certainly not the feared Armageddon. Ron Schultz reminded us that the worst that came out of those fearful days was the need for a hospital to do a community health needs assessment. Other than some misguided folks in Illinois, all is well in the hospital community, at least from a tax perspective, in year 2011.
Following Pattara and Schultz was Steve Clarke, who is now the IRS’s ultimate authority on all Form 990 matters. He brought with him two colleagues, Judy Kindell and Garrett Gluth. Judy said that for the IRS folks it’s Happy New Year. Again, we needed David Fish, this time to sing Auld Lang Syne to mark the end of the IRS’s fiscal year. Not surprisingly, the EO Division is starting its new year without a workplan, but Judy promises it “soon,” which probably means we can expect it in time for Valentine’s Day. Speaking of the EO Division, my latest roster is already out of date, as Melaney Partner has been selected as the new Customer Education & Outreach director, and Holly Paz will be going on maternity leave, with the aforementioned David Fish acting for her, and Mary Jo Salins acting for him. The good news coming out of the EO Division is that, of the 300,000 automatic revocations, only 4,000 have sought reinstatement to date, indicating that most revoked organizations are defunct, hopefully abating Bill Brockner’s fears that these mass revocations would be cataclysmic for his beloved garden clubs and similar organizations clueless as to their tax obligations.
1 – No Recession in EO Hiring?
2 – Ms. Totally Anonymous Joins Mr. Totally Anonymous
3 – Two Responses to “Bad Liberal (c)(3) Spotted”
4 – How Many Angels Can Dance on the Head of a Pin?
5 – Will a Cap on Contributions Destroy Charities?
6 – Tax Court Finds NEA Members Have a Legal Right to Receive NEA Publications, Resulting in Allocation of a Portion of Members’ Dues to Circulation Income
1 – The EOTJ Mailbag
2 – Oprah Nudged Out by Gates and Buffett
3 – More Practical Solutions for Private Foundations
4 – Whither the EO Division?
1 – EOTJ Mailbag
2 – Weekend Reading
3 – Latest Information on Automatic Revocations from Sandy Deja
4 – Urban Institute’s “Snapshot” of Revoked Organizations
5 – COF Continues to Seek Update of Rev. Proc. 92-94
6 – IRS Revoking Credit Unions by Mistake?
1 – EOTJ Mailbag
2 – The Book Nook
3 – ECFA Announcement
With Labor Day approaching, I’m clearing off my desk of old business today so I can start fresh next week. If I missed anything, including your missives, my apologies, but in the last few weeks I’ve survived an earthquake, a hurricane, a power outage, and having my garage struck by lightning, so those are my excuses and I’m sticking with them.
1 – The EOTJ Mailbag
2 – Ellen Aprill Explains All
3 – New GuideStar Publication
1 – More on Compensation
2 – Duke Basketball Follows Georgetown to China
3 – Healthcare Groups Suggest Detailed Schedule H Changes
4 – ALI-ABA Program on Tax-Exempt Organizations
5 – Calling Nan Downing — Have These Guys Been Audited?
1 – Response to Beth Kingsley Interview
2 – Article Fails to Note Rules re Separate Entity Status
3 – More on the Gift Tax and Section 501(c)(4)
4 – Is This Organization a Good (c)(3)?
1 – Reaction to Latest ACT Committee Report
2 – EO Committee to Meet in the Mile High City